他之：位方藏对于中当艺院的法
2009年11月26日 23:11:04 作：Josep 来：艺国
字：大中小
吴鸿：
这给你来刚到在班的位藏的信，信他达了中当艺术院看。觉得意。我讨这问的候听局人看也 许益在去年，Josep收了少国代艺的品例王义《批》。对中很爱并在习文传统哲。与的识
点时了知他看是有意。议您够将他信表艺国网上让多人享
吕
2009年11月26日
吕生您，
我想得关于中当艺院成在国起沸扬的论这里是样，是们那超10亿的围。
我给介一我知的洲化系
这体很程是众性，的物和厚金源政。
实上文是术、蹈剧院电影及有化现形的合。此对而中当艺术院好了因它关乎种术介式而欧洲 大数讨论都围绕各媒所的量它所的金额。
总来说，洲化系以为两种型欧大陆和格撒逊型
欧大陆般由府文部中力他直负责博馆的事免财政算并对扶哪艺术或化型有定。
而格鲁克型要立艺理会，这由化人组成团体挥重的用为政相部提意、交物的导选等显然们要
立政部门不政的响，是金终是自府，事的员也由府议会（根底是政势力其执政）任。
西牙一受央府制文部而加罗亚自政有个艺理会。过长被命个月离，为政控着财政并图涉（参 我你Word文中介绍
我认这是东、方会发生情，管国还是洲黑还是人都重，是性然为什他任这些非些为什这种术 式具 代性非他式为么涉到术类里时有时会没有展、展、术、评家画廊为什文部多少对艺术加控？ 什不
是们是人能管部钱？什我只提建而文部决做别事？此等
中当艺院成，认为这是件事当代术一被府可里的员都很要艺术家叶永是位术念阔知分（是于 写这艺术家究判）他能什?他们促政去什？们会被府牢制是其动中会现更省级的术构他将定
提强力意见导致策履吗?在集共资方他会供有的见吗？们有决哪活可与吗？们为什支这项活 而其？ 新物始前是很问的这也常。少代术普到个社，对术、展、物，及有事术人件事更一说，
如中政赞这个机，想省会实，关艺术方的就会得认可而后讨论也致于社也可们。以如你兴 趣那 更复杂内部题试图与讨论并取持恐是困的但际况就如。果，们唯能的是大们对当代术兴趣并 予代
术好呈，么代术的立经是成了
我跟说我年的国之，时了798，798刚放我司不道哪我的游不。我走一个廊很憾都很很的间） 这个导游孩现一前未的世，很轻，慧思开阔、大教背。现在你在立物、国内外办览，府成了 国当代术。
不在，府会试掌人的量动，国也例。是们的境好反你国政独特是央策他开了个小的，果们去 反它将头血，府力在个地都强大但你能的就联起把扇开得来越，果要反，好办法是里去 变非外。班政变革历史明尽管革不很、彻底至也改，且内去力容使作有效
我们多候会考，们的间要止而们前的间很长。论有，是作历学者大知，着间流我会更轻的 度谈曾的论而更地价些际得成；反那理主者理家难取更、全的步你我实用义，是们西牙在70 年末80年初经了难革那所的实主者们那理主义获了显著成。
这理可应用任机，时也适于业。前做售理，有就我常诫我同跟工首是亮再星。相很人懂 这简道，们在乏固础的况下是做些分难以无法成事而考那他能什事，他而，好仅仅跟一梦而 不付诸动。
下是些链：
我觉加罗尼的例有，为这是刚生事（一用Google工翻译） http://www20.gencat.cat/portal/site/CulturaDepartament/menuitem.08b5bfd30a1b7a434fbfd875b0c0e1a0 /?vgnextoid=8ceebd8139f52210VgnVCM1000008d0c1e0aRCRD&vgnextchannel=8ceebd8139f52210 VgnVCM1000008d0c1e0aRCRD&vgnextfmt=default
英的
http://www.artscouncil.org.uk/about-us/
加大蒙利尔
http://www.artsmontreal.org/mission.php
法和班的央化策这没有艺理的容
http://www.culture.gouv.fr/culture/min/index-min.htm
http://www.mcu.es/promoArte/CE/InformacionGeneral/Gestion.html
一顺，
约夫
................................................................................................................................................................
Hi Lü,
I can imagine the discussions about CAAC, I'm sure that are
the same than here, but you are more than 1.000.000.000 people there!
Let
me told you what I know from the European system of culture.
This system is
mainly public, big Museums and Big money comes from Government.
Actually,
Culture is a mix of arts, dance, theatre, cinema and all kind of cultural expressions.
Therefore, in the case of CAAC is much better because there is only one type of media.
Here most of the discussions came about the weight of each media regarding representatives
and the part of the money's pie!
To organise that there are two systems: Mainland
Europe and Anglo-Saxon.
The European one is centralise all the power in the
Culture Ministry. They are responsible directly of the Heads of the Museum, the Budgets,
how distribute them and decide which kind of art/culture promote.
The Anglo-Saxon
is to create an "Arts Councils". An organisation with people from culture to manage
a big part of the pie, advice the Ministry and propose for example the Heads of the
Museums. Apparently they have to be independent and without influence of the Government,
but the money comes at the end from Government and they are appointed by it or the
Parliament (but in any case by politicians and mostly by the Party on charge at that
moment).
In Spain there exists a centralised Ministry of Culture and in the
Catalonia Autonomous Government there exists an Arts Council. By the way the Head
dismissed a few months after been nominated because the Ministry cut budgets and
wanted to influence him (see article in word document).
I think that all this
things happens in east and western, to be Chinese or European, black or whites, doesn't
matter. It's part of the human nature.
Why there appointed this ones and
not this others? Why there are more representative from this kind of art or this
other? Why there are or not representative from any category involved in art: curators,
exhibitors, artists, critics, galleries...? Why the Ministry wants to control more
or less? Why we can not manage this amount of money or this other? Why we advice
about that but the Ministry decides that other thing? and much more...
In
the case of China I think is a good thing. For the first time Contemporary art is
considered by the Government. People inside are among the most important painters.Ye
Yongqing appears to me an intellectual with open mind (I'm based on your biography).
What they can do? What they will be able form the Government to do? Will be centralised
or will exists more Councils at Province level? They will decide or have a strong
advice about which policy to follow?
Will they have a strong advice on how
invest public money? Will they decide in which activities invest or not? Why they
supported this activity and not this other? A lot of questions when something new
starts, but always is like this. At least contemporary art will be more known to
the Chinese whole society and that's good for artist, for curators, for Museums...
for all the people involved in the Arts. Moreover, if the Central Government approves
this Council, I'm sure the Provinces will follow, so more acknowledgement about Art,
and the discussions afterwards will only contribute to a more acknowledgement by
people. Ok, if you are interested inside this world will be tough to discuss with
others and fight for support and so on, but is always like this. If the only thing
they were able to do is to expand the interest for Contemporary art and give to it
a better visibility, CAAC will be already a success.
I've already explain
you my visit, just 4 years ago, to 798 area when started. Our driver doesn't know
where to go, our guide nor. When we entered to the Galleries (well, a kind of small
and empty spaces!) this girl discovered a new world that never before know about
it, and she was young, smart, open minded and with University career. Now, you build
Museums, Exhibitions flowered around all China and abroad, Government starts this
CAAC...
It's true that Government, there and here, try to embrace the maximum
of our activities, and China could not be different. But in your case the direction
is the contrary, from a unique and centralised policy, they open an small door. It's
impossible to fight against, it's sterile. The power of the Governments it's everywhere
too huge. But what it's possible to do is collaborate to make the door wider and
bigger and bigger, and if it's needed to fight, much better from inside to promote
change than outside. History of the political transition in Spain show us that maybe
the changes won't be so high and radical, but at least changes, and it's easier but
less spectacular to do it inside. A lot of times we think that the time is finishing
by now, and the time is a long way ahead of us. Discussion are interesting now, but,
you probably know as historian, that with the time things and fights become viewed
with more relativity and achievements will be more positive evaluated than idealisms
or theories much more difficult to achieve fully and immediately. You call me a pragmatic,
but we had a tough transition in Spain in late 70's and beginning 80's and the approach
of "pragmatic" people was more successful than "idealists". And this theory can be
applied at any Institution or, let me say, also Company. When I used to be Marketing
Director my better successes and what I teaching to my colleagues and employees was
always: First the Moon, after Mars! And I can assure you than a lot of people doesn't
understand this simple principle, they always wanted to do things too difficult to
achieve without first consolidate position and do the things were be possible, for
them was better not to act in order to follow a dream rather than act.
Below a few links:
I think that the Catalan one is quite interesting
because it's the most recent experience. (this front page translated in word document
using Google tools).
http://www20.gencat.cat/portal/site/CulturaDepartament/menuitem.08b5bfd30a1b7a434fbfd875b0c0e1a0 /?vgnextoid=8ceebd8139f52210VgnVCM1000008d0c1e0aRCRD&vgnextchannel=8ceebd8139f52210 VgnVCM1000008d0c1e0aRCRD&vgnextfmt=default
UK
http://www.artscouncil.org.uk/about-us/
Montreal
http://www.artsmontreal.org/mission.php
Centralised cultural policies in France and Spain. Not Arts councils there.
http://www.culture.gouv.fr/culture/min/index-min.htm
http://www.mcu.es/promoArte/CE/InformacionGeneral/Gestion.html
Warm regards
Josep
